Call Now!
(720) 770-8413

Call Now!
(720) 770-8413

Understanding Colorado Child Custody: Parenting Time, Decision-Making, and Support

Nov 4, 2025

Colorado’s approach to child custody differs from many other states, using terminology that more accurately reflects what matters most in family law cases: how parents spend time with their children and who makes important decisions about their upbringing. Whether you’re going through a divorce or establishing parental responsibilities outside of marriage, understanding Colorado’s framework can help you navigate this challenging process with greater confidence.

What Colorado Calls “Custody”

Many parents come to family law attorneys asking about “legal custody” and “physical custody,” terms commonly used in other states and popular media. Colorado takes a different approach with language that focuses on practical realities rather than abstract concepts of ownership or control.

Instead of physical custody, Colorado uses the term “parenting time.” This refers to when and where children spend time with each parent. Rather than framing this as one parent having custody while the other has visitation, Colorado recognizes that children benefit from meaningful time with both parents.

Legal custody is known in Colorado as “decision-making” or “parental responsibilities.” This encompasses who makes important choices about the children’s education, religious upbringing, extracurricular activities, healthcare, and other significant aspects of their lives.

These concepts apply equally whether you’re divorcing or were never married to the other parent. The key distinction is that you need a court to help determine and formalize who has what rights concerning the children. These issues are also typically interconnected with child support obligations.

Colorado’s Presumption of Shared Parenting

Colorado law operates under a fundamental presumption: children benefit from having relatively equal time with both parents, circumstances permitting. The state views parenting time as the child’s right, not simply a parent’s entitlement, and generally believes it serves the child’s best interest to maintain strong relationships with both parents.

This presumption shapes how courts approach parenting time arrangements. Rather than defaulting to one parent having primary custody while the other gets every other weekend, Colorado courts start from the position that time should be divided as evenly as possible given the circumstances.

The same philosophy applies to decision-making. Courts prefer that parents share parental responsibilities and agree on major questions affecting their children’s lives. When parents cannot agree, courts may divide decision-making by category, perhaps giving one parent authority over educational decisions while the other handles religious upbringing. In some situations, courts will award all decision-making authority to one parent, but this isn’t the starting assumption.

How Child Support Works in Colorado

Child support in Colorado follows a fairly structured formula established by state guidelines. These guidelines aren’t optional. Parties must calculate child support according to this framework and present those calculations to the court.

However, calculating support by the guidelines doesn’t mean you must follow them exactly. Courts can be convinced to deviate from the guideline amount if there’s good reason to do so. You might agree with the other parent that support should be more, less, paid differently, or even paid in kind rather than through direct payments.

The critical point is that you must first calculate what the guidelines would require. This gives the court a baseline to understand what it’s deviating from and allows the judge to properly weigh whether the alternative arrangement serves the child’s best interests.

The guidelines consider multiple factors, with parental income being among the most significant. The fundamental principle is that children have a right to the financial resources of both parents. This is child support, not parental support. It’s about the child’s entitlement to benefit from both parents’ financial means.

The calculation process combines both parents’ incomes and applies a percentage based on the number of children involved. That total represents the combined amount that should go toward supporting the children. The obligation is then divided between parents proportionally based on their respective incomes. A parent earning significantly more will typically bear a larger share of the support obligation.

The Best Interest of the Child Standard

Every decision courts make regarding parenting time, decision-making authority, parental responsibilities, child support, and related matters must center on one principle: the best interest of the child. This standard guides everything in Colorado custody cases.

Even when parents reach a complete agreement, they must still present to the court why that agreement serves the child’s best interests. The court won’t simply rubber-stamp any arrangement parents propose. There must be a showing that the agreed-upon terms benefit the children.

This raises an important question: how does the court determine what serves a child’s best interests? Courts rely heavily on evidence presented by the parties, typically with guidance from legal counsel who understands what information judges find most relevant. Effective presentation of this evidence is crucial to achieving favorable outcomes.

In some cases, courts appoint outside professionals to provide additional insight. A Child and Family Investigator (CFI) may be assigned to serve as the court’s eyes and ears, investigating the home environment and circumstances of each parent before making recommendations about what arrangements would best serve the children.

In other situations, a Child Legal Representative may be appointed, an attorney who represents the children directly, standing in court on equal footing with each parent’s lawyer to advocate specifically for the child’s interests and perspective.

These various approaches, whether used individually or in combination, help courts answer the complex question of what truly serves a child’s best interests. To be effective in this process, parents must demonstrate that they genuinely prioritize their children’s well-being over their own interests.

Modifying Custody Orders

Life doesn’t stand still after a custody order is entered. Parents frequently wonder whether they can change arrangements that no longer work or never worked well in the first place.

The answer is yes. It’s absolutely possible to modify parenting time, decision-making authority, and child support. However, there are rules governing when and how modifications can occur.

The general rule is that once a decision has been made, you must wait two years before asking the court to change parenting time or parental responsibilities unless there’s been a substantial change in circumstances justifying an earlier review.

What constitutes a substantial change? For child support, this might mean one party’s income has changed significantly. For parenting time, perhaps the child’s needs have evolved or the circumstances of one or both parents have shifted in meaningful ways. Similarly, changes in the child’s needs or parental circumstances might justify revisiting decision-making arrangements.

If you can prove these changed circumstances, the court will entertain a modification request before the two-year mark. After two years have passed, you can simply ask the court to revisit the arrangements without needing to prove specific changes.

Enforcing Custody Orders

Another common situation arises when one parent isn’t following the court’s orders regarding parenting time, decision-making, or child support. Whether these terms came from a judge’s ruling or from an agreement between parents that the court approved, they’re equally enforceable.

Colorado courts provide mechanisms to address non-compliance. You can file for enforcement of the court’s orders, asking the judge to take action to bring the other parent into compliance. Courts can also use their contempt power to compel parents to follow orders.

Different strategies work better for different circumstances. Sometimes, enforcement proceedings are most appropriate; other times, contempt actions are preferable, and occasionally both approaches should be pursued. The specific facts of your situation will determine the best course of action.

The important takeaway is that courts absolutely will enforce their orders and the agreements they’ve approved. If the other parent isn’t following the rules established for parenting time, parental responsibilities, decision-making, or child support, legal remedies are available.

The Value of Agreement

While courts provide essential oversight and decision-making when parents cannot agree, the best outcomes often come from parents reaching their own agreements whenever possible. Working toward consensus rather than immediately turning to litigation keeps these crucial decisions in parents’ hands rather than placing them entirely with a judge who has limited time to understand your family’s unique dynamics.

Seeking agreement doesn’t mean giving up on what’s important. It means finding ways to compromise that still protect your children’s well-being and your relationship with them. When you can shape the parenting plan collaboratively, you create arrangements more likely to work practically and less likely to generate ongoing conflict.

Of course, agreement isn’t always possible. When parents cannot find common ground, the focus shifts to presenting compelling evidence to the court. This evidence should demonstrate that you can promote a positive relationship between your children and the other parent, and that you’re fighting for what’s truly in your children’s best interests rather than simply advancing your own preferences.

Taking the Next Step

Colorado’s approach to child custody, parenting time, and support is designed to keep the focus where it belongs: on what serves children best. Whether you’re just beginning to navigate these issues or need to modify or enforce existing orders, understanding the framework can help you make informed decisions and advocate effectively for your family.

If you’re facing questions about parenting time, decision-making authority, child support, or enforcement of existing orders, New Leaf Family can provide the guidance you need. 

Christopher Anderson

Christopher Anderson

Attorney

Christopher is a really smart guy (no … he did not write this!) He can analyze and pick apart a dense legal argument like nobody’s business, and then in the next breath explain special relativity or space-time to an 8-year-old. And Christopher has a passion for changing the way Family Law is practiced. He founded New Leaf Family with the dual purpose of: Working to empower clients to make the best decisions for themselves and their families; To make the financial aspect of Family Law more predictable and straightforward for clients. By keeping most decisions in the hands of our clients, Christopher believes they will have more satisfaction with the outcomes, and their families will come through to the next chapter in much better shape. Christopher received his A.B. from Cornell University a really long time ago, when some men had mullets and still took themselves seriously. After Cornell, Christopher went to Georgia, and achieved his J.D.. from the University of Georgia, around the time when you’d hear songs on the radio about things being “ironic” that really aren’t. Christopher started his legal career by prosecuting bad guys accused of horrific sex, crimes for the Bronx District Attorney’s office, and the courtroom became his second home. Over the years he has practiced in several different areas, handling matters as diverse as nasty divorces and custody battles to serving as general counsel to tech companies to representing pilots in licensing issues. In addition to being a scary trial lawyer when called upon to whip out those skills, Christopher also has developed a habit of being invited to give talks to other lawyers about legal technology and law practice management at big lawyer conferences, and works to help other lawyers across the country to improve their law firms as well. Like Penn, Christopher is admitted to practice law in the state and federal courts of Colorado, New York and Georgia. Christopher enjoys snow skiing, oenology, quantum mechanics and astrophysics. He is a frequent, if not always enthusiastic, runner. He is conversational in Dutch and roots for the Netherlands during the World Cup. He makes a mean cappuccino and prefers his martinis stirred, not shaken.